I try to make it as brief as possible. The so-called pandemic of Corona (Covid-19) has scientific and logical flaws. As I will show, there is no way that scientists in Wuhan were able to make a case for a new flu like illness and a specific virus as underlying cause. Therefor all the testing is meaningless and could only serve a political purpose. There you have it.
TLTR#1: It’s not possible to diagnose a patient with Corona (Covid-19) without a test. So how did the Chinese scientists in Wuhan prove that the newly found virus caused a „specific“ illness when we now know that there are healthy persons who tested positive for the virus? It’s not enough to show that the „virus“ grew in a Petri dish. First, it’s not possible to isolate a virus and second of all, in the unnatural process to „grow a virus“, there are a lot of chemicals and toxic ingredients involved. This doesn’t tell us how „this very virus“ would behave in a living organism or why there are „asymptomatic“ cases out there, and it doesn’t fulfill Koch’s Postulates
TLTR#2: The Chinese virologists couldn’t use a RT-PCR-test to find some mysterious „new virus“. They needed the RNA sequence of that very virus in order to find it in the sample („matrix“). Where did they get this crucial information? My guess is from the lab in Wuhan, courtesy of CDC.
TLTR#3: The germ theory is flawed and should be scientifically questioned before corrupt politicians and bought media can prolong the fear of „contagious killer viruses“ indefinitely and call that „The New Normal“. Next stop in this episode of the twilight zone: The centralized „health pass“ for the whole world.
By the way, this Christmas is cancelled, of course.
Excellent talk between Dr. Andy Kaufman and Dr. Tom Cowan regarding the problems with germ theory and the myth about contagion.
update November 2020
International Consortium of Scientists in Life Sciences (ICLS): „External peer review of the RTPCR test to detect SARS-CoV-2 reveals 10 major scientific flaws at the molecular and methodological level: consequences for false positive results“.
update November 2020
„It can be observed that at Ct = 25, up to 70% of patients remain positive in culture and that at Ct = 30 this value drops to 20%. At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive“. Conclusion of this Oxford University paper: The chance that the person received a “false positive” result is 97% or higher. See also a Portuguese Court ruling, mentioning this scientific paper.
update November 2020
John Hopkins University Newsletter: „one can hardly say that Covid-19 deaths are concerning“ „not only has Covid-19 had no effect on the percentage of deaths of older people, but it has also not increased the total number of deaths“.
Editor of The Lancet on a Symposium in 2015: „The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness. As one participant put it, ‚poor methods get results‘.“
Finding the cause for an unspecific illness!
How could the Chinese scientists know that this virus they later defined as SARS-CoV-2 is the cause for a flu like illness they later named „Corona/Covid-19“. It isn’t possible today to diagnose a patient with Covid-19 without a test. There is always a test involved. But how did they diagnose the new illness back then in China, when there was no test available? That means if you can’t make a clinical case for a specific illness you are not able to prove scientifically a certain cause for it. So, let’s say if you want to research the cause of measles, you have to know whether the patient is clinical diagnosed with measles. But when the symptoms don’t tell you exactly what kind of illness you have to deal with, then all further research is pointless.
Let’s put it that way: If scientists want to prove that a very specific microorganism (bacteria, virus, etc.) is the cause for a very specific illness they have to show that the microorganism is present in all sick patients (see Koch’s Postulate). Can you find the microorganism in a healthy person, what should that tell you? The microorganism is not the cause for the illness. Perhaps, the scientists should look for another microorganism. By the way, we have a lot more living and nonliving organisms in our body than human cells. The cell itself is so complex, it’s like a microscopic city with a power plant. The more we learn about the human cell the more baffled the scientists are. So don’t be fooled by the ludicrous statement, that science knows all and everything about nature and health. We might have 21st century tech but mainstream science is stuck in the Middle Ages: High Priests of the Science Temple tell you what is true and what is false. Try to challenge them and your livelihood will burn at the stake. And the free media of the western world is applauding the auto-da-fé.
To put the cart before the horse!
Let’s imagine how the scenario in Wuhan must have been played out. A lot of people get sick with flu like symptoms. Not unusual as we know that the flu is responsible for hospitalization of thousands of people each year. And it isn’t unusual that some patients battle with respiratory complications (pneumonia).
So how did they go from „it’s only a bad flu season“ to „there must be a new virus“? Of course Chinese and western media convinced us that „all“ of the patients have had very specific „respiratory complications“ and had to be put on ventilators. But that’s not true. Only a small percentage of the „infected“ patients, who were immunocompromised, needed intensive care. Some say today that ventilation did more harm than good.
So we have a lot of patients with flu like symptoms like in a bad flu season, and we have immunocompromised patients with severe medical conditions who got an infection which in general is serious and can be deadly. No need for a new virus to do the killing.
Now Chinese virologists get the feeling that there must be a new virus which is responsible for „this specific flu like illness“? Hold on! How is it possible to differ between a patient who got the normal flu (allegedly) caused by influenza viruses and a patient with this new illness? Perhaps testing? Okay, now they test all the patients and find what they are looking for: influenza viruses. You can always find influenza viruses in the body if you are looking for some. The scientists call that strange phenomenon „asymptomatic“, which means: „We have no idea why you are not sick despite the fact that you have the virus in your body.“ Maybe because the germ theory is totally flawed? Mind you the theory was invented in a time when a militaristic and materialistic world view influenced heavily the thoughts of most of the western scientists.
But the Chinese virologists insist that there must be a new virus despite lack of evidence. So they take organic material from a patient with flu like symptoms and respiratory complications. We have to assume that this patient is also immunocompromised which makes research for causation a lot harder. The virologists grind, filter and centrifugate the material. The result of that process is a „soup“ the experts call „matrix“, containing not only viruses but all kinds of particles and extracellular vesicles (EVs) of a certain density. But how to get the very virus out of that soup? They can’t. Nobody can.* There is no virus, only small fragments of the nucleic acid called nucleotides (parts of the RNA-code). If the scientists want to „isolate“ the „virus“ they have to use two already available „primers“ with the genetic sequence of the „virus“. But Chinese virologists in Wuhan didn’t have a primer because they didn’t know the genetic sequence of the new virus. So how did they get the RNA sequence of the new virus? Simply enough, they looked it up in a database. What database you might ask? I guess it was the database of the Lab in Wuhan. In that facility scientists researched the coronaviruses. How do I know that? The CDC told us that. Why does the CDC know what’s going on in a Chinese lab? Because the CDC is financing this research as it was deemed too dangerous to do this kind of experimentation in the U.S. You see a pattern here, do you?
We can assume that the Chinese scientists didn’t look for a new virus in ill patients and didn’t proof that this new virus is the cause for a new flu like illness. Instead, they looked up all the new viruses of the corona family in the database of the lab, „identified“ the „right one“, took the readily available primer for that very virus, SARS-Cov-2, began testing with the RT-PCR-process, found a lot of „positive cases“, named the (unspecific) flu like illness „Corona“ and the rest is history.
Dr. Kary Mullis, inventor of the PCR test, stated explicitly that „You can find almost anything in anybody. It doesn’t tell you’re sick!“
In other words the Chinese scientists put the cart before the horse and the million-dollar question is why did they invent a new flu like illness? And the billion-dollar question is why western politicians (except for President Donald Trump) and western media went along with it. Maybe all the debt-ridden countries and publishing houses are dependent on China’s goodwill. And one thing all of them have in common is the hate for a nationalistic U.S. under Donald Trump and the love for a (left leaning) New World Order some would call „communism“.
Lastly, don’t think for a moment that China and CCP are the culprits of this plandemic. So who is to blame for this charade?
It’s the Establishment, who financed the past (i.e. the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia under Lenin or the Cultural Revolution in China under Mao) who calls the shot today. And no, a Bill Gates doesn’t belong to this Establishment. He is only a useful idiot.
*) In a scientific paper published in May 2020 you can read the following: „However, to date, a reliable method that can actually guarantee a complete separation (from extracellular vesicles and viruses) does not exist“. To understand this, we have to know, that there is no such thing as „a“ virus you can point to or extract. What you find are small segments of the nucleic acid called nucleotides (parts of the RNA), but no „virus“. To „find“ the very virus they are looking for the researchers have to fill in the „blanks“ and generate a full RNA sequence by a computer model. It’s all very sketchy when your research has no basis in reality.
So what did the Chinese virologists do? They took the sample of organic material from one and only one ill person, ground and filtered it, so that only the smallest particles were left in the remaining „soup“. They took this „soup“ and began experimenting with various cell lines (experiments of the CDC included monkey kidneys and lung cancer cells) to see if the „virus“ would grow. In order to do that, they have to starve and poison the „soup“ to get „results“. That’s all they did and it’s called „science“. And now imagine the scientific process necessary in researching and finding a vaccine for … for what exactly?
I kindly remind you to not tell anybody about this whole charade or you’re labeled as „anti-vaxxer“ and „covidiot“.