Gestern war es, als die Pressesprecherin des Weißen Hauses Kayleigh McEnany in einem Interview auf Fox News meinte, dass die verordneten Covid19-Maßnahmen der Gouverneure in den einzelnen Bundesstaaten rund um die anstehenden Feiertage „orwellian“ seien. Twitter explodierte kurzfristig und so manch linksliberaler Professor, der es sich im Elfenbeinturm wohlig warm eingerichtet hat, fühlte sich bemüßigt, Kayleigh dafür zu kritisieren. Ich bin jedenfalls sehr erfreut, dass der gute Orwell endlich die Aufmerksamkeit erhält, die er verdient. Was er vor rund 70 Jahren geschrieben hat, ist heute aktueller denn je. Freilich, viele wollen das nicht sehen und winken ab. Fragt man diese Leutchen nach dem Ergebnis von 2 + 2, erhält man als Antwort:
„Warum fragst du das überhaupt. Natürlich ist es 5. Was soll es denn sonst sein. 4 vielleicht? Du bist ja schon ganz verblödet!“
You will notice that English is not my mother tongue. So why not ranting in German? Because you can’t do it. The German language is not able to tell people to go f*ck yourself without being seen as a jerk who has no idea what he is talking about. The American English is the perfect language to say what’s on your mind, without thinking too much about crossing the line of a civilized speech. And the best part of it most of the German-speaking people won’t bother to read an English article. It’s too cumbersome. My hope is, that this rant will reach the right people with the right mindset. I don’t need no sheeple. Period.
I try to make it as brief as possible. The so-called pandemic of Corona (Covid-19) has scientific and logical flaws. As I will show, there is no way that scientists in Wuhan were able to make a case for a new flu like illness and a specific virus as underlying cause. Therefor all the testing is meaningless and could only serve a political purpose. There you have it.
TLTR#1: It’s not possible to diagnose a patient with Corona (Covid-19) without a test. So how did the Chinese scientists in Wuhan prove that the newly found virus caused a „specific“ illness when we now know that there are healthy persons who tested positive for the virus? It’s not enough to show that the „virus“ grew in a Petri dish. First, it’s not possible to isolate a virus and second of all, in the unnatural process to „grow a virus“, there are a lot of chemicals and toxic ingredients involved. This doesn’t tell us how „this very virus“ would behave in a living organism or why there are „asymptomatic“ cases out there, and it doesn’t fulfill Koch’s Postulates
TLTR#2: The Chinese virologists couldn’t use a RT-PCR-test to find some mysterious „new virus“. They needed the RNA sequence of that very virus in order to find it in the sample („matrix“). Where did they get this crucial information? My guess is from the lab in Wuhan, courtesy of CDC.
TLTR#3: The germ theory is flawed and should be scientifically questioned before corrupt politicians and bought media can prolong the fear of „contagious killer viruses“ indefinitely and call that „The New Normal“. Next stop in this episode of the twilight zone: The centralized „health pass“ for the whole world.
By the way, this Christmas is cancelled, of course.
Excellent talk between Dr. Andy Kaufman and Dr. Tom Cowan regarding the problems with germ theory and the myth about contagion.
update 11/23/2020: „It can be observed that at Ct = 25, up to 70% of patients remain positive in culture and that at Ct = 30 this value drops to 20%. At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, <3% of cultures are positive“. Conclusion of this Oxford University paper: The chance that the person received a “false positive” result is 97% or higher. See also a Portuguese Court ruling, mentioning this scientific paper.